And where does this presumption of 17h 11m 05s come from? I'm asking out of interest, not disbelieving you or anything!palkanetoijala31 wrote:The 2 times in question are 17h 12m 18s by Jay Flynn (bouncingtigger) and some put Tim Roberts and Martha Jackson claim under this time of 17h 12m 18s instead of presumed 17h 11m 05s so i took it off main page wikipedia for being wrong.!Now we have all sorts of changes going on wikipedia Jay time was well documented on here finishing at Brixton his time has never been put to the main page as of yet.The other time or any other mystery time that no 1 knows of how can we know about it unless they have proof (picture of certificate) then produce if not then let them claim a time of whatever hours min or secs rightly.jonny wrote:How do you know what the 'right' time is? Or has he been on here at some point and said?
I've found this all quite hard to follow...
My Rant is over im chilled and calm
wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
- jonny
- Zone 6
- Posts: 796
- Joined: 02 May 2005, 11:42
- Location: Rugby
Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
he quoted the wrong time for the wrong person/s thats all if wikipedia is a factual website and least it should be correct facts.Presumed might have been a wrong word if it exists then he can had it to the site but until evidence as been put in as this wikipedia user claims he has then why ask me for my evidence.?jonny wrote:And where does this presumption of 17h 11m 05s come from? I'm asking out of interest, not disbelieving you or anything!palkanetoijala31 wrote:The 2 times in question are 17h 12m 18s by Jay Flynn (bouncingtigger) and some put Tim Roberts and Martha Jackson claim under this time of 17h 12m 18s instead of presumed 17h 11m 05s so i took it off main page wikipedia for being wrong.!Now we have all sorts of changes going on wikipedia Jay time was well documented on here finishing at Brixton his time has never been put to the main page as of yet.The other time or any other mystery time that no 1 knows of how can we know about it unless they have proof (picture of certificate) then produce if not then let them claim a time of whatever hours min or secs rightly.jonny wrote:How do you know what the 'right' time is? Or has he been on here at some point and said?
I've found this all quite hard to follow...
My Rant is over im chilled and calm
To end my views on this matter i dont care anymore i have 16h 44m 16s shared and on guinness its still the world record time to beat!Thats it my final view!
- Sam
- The Twilight Zone
- Posts: 4240
- Joined: 19 Jul 2005, 13:14
- Location: Forest of Dean
- Contact:
Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
You mean that you haven't already?***** wrote:andi, the more you go on about it ... the more it wants to make me go in and edit Wikipedia just to wind you up! or register under a fake name here, and start making claims!! you're opening yourself up to being wound up!!


Ze forum's female train driver
- Starkey7
- All Zones
- Posts: 2382
- Joined: 30 Aug 2005, 00:04
- Location: Bath, Somerset
Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
I think that this Tim Roberts or whoever it is also deleted Sam's time a number of times, having looked at the page's history.
- Sam
- The Twilight Zone
- Posts: 4240
- Joined: 19 Jul 2005, 13:14
- Location: Forest of Dean
- Contact:
Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
Yeah, seems they don't just have a personal vendetta against Andi, they dislike me as well 
Matt did a citation for me to his blog which had the picture of the certificate so hopefully they'll leave me alone now. I'm not stressing over it though as I have the evidence and they are welcome to come round and see it any time

Matt did a citation for me to his blog which had the picture of the certificate so hopefully they'll leave me alone now. I'm not stressing over it though as I have the evidence and they are welcome to come round and see it any time



Ze forum's female train driver
-
- Zone 3
- Posts: 146
- Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 19:39
- Location: St Andrews, Scotland
Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
Does anyone else wish to enter into constructive dialogue, or whatever, with AndraiensQ over the wikipedia page?
- tubeguru
- Site Administrator
- Posts: 9182
- Joined: 30 Jan 2005, 22:08
- Location: The Twilight Zone
- Contact:
Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
Has he entered into constructive dialogue with anyone yet?
I'm not fully up to speed with what exactly has been changed and in what order over on Wikipedia and the whole thing confuses me.
I'm not fully up to speed with what exactly has been changed and in what order over on Wikipedia and the whole thing confuses me.
One thing only do I know, and that is that I know nothing - Socrates.
Champion of bugger all, 2004 to 2025
Member of sweet FA
Champion of bugger all, 2004 to 2025
Member of sweet FA
- Starkey7
- All Zones
- Posts: 2382
- Joined: 30 Aug 2005, 00:04
- Location: Bath, Somerset
Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
The way I see it is that he's suddenly come on to the scene and started moving things around and deleting things. Who is he?! And why is he so enthusiastic about having the Tube Challenge page the way he wants it? 

-
- Zone 3
- Posts: 146
- Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 19:39
- Location: St Andrews, Scotland
Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
If you look carefully, you'll find that when he didn't get his way, he put a tag on the page suggesting it for deletion.
Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
I must say thanx good Dr jbom for adding my citations a free beer is urs when u want it
if u can add the link to the famous five attempt in the media would be good as well for people to watch.I would say i would discuss this with andraiensq but people have told me to chill and that is what i will do im actually quite pissed (5 pints of carling 2 spitfires) while typing this and dont care anymore but at least people can probably understand why now!

Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
Come off it Neil if that was the real person then such person might have actually made a pretend post or real post Im sorry to have say this but the forum and wikipedia has got quite childish behaviour recently.Im not at complete fault in this but at least im not like former forum member ******** or wikipedia user andrainesq i can back up any claims or views i have made my views are mine whether people disagree or agree with them who cares.tubeguru wrote:Well, as someone with the username "Tim_Roberts" has recently joined the forum, I would invite him to put his side of the story across.
This assumes that it is the "real" Tim Roberts and not someone trying to wind you up further.
- tubeguru
- Site Administrator
- Posts: 9182
- Joined: 30 Jan 2005, 22:08
- Location: The Twilight Zone
- Contact:
Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
Funnily enough, you make more sense when you're drunk.palkanetoijala31 wrote:I must say thanx good Dr jbom for adding my citations a free beer is urs when u want itif u can add the link to the famous five attempt in the media would be good as well for people to watch.I would say i would discuss this with andraiensq but people have told me to chill and that is what i will do im actually quite pissed (5 pints of carling 2 spitfires) while typing this and dont care anymore but at least people can probably understand why now!

One thing only do I know, and that is that I know nothing - Socrates.
Champion of bugger all, 2004 to 2025
Member of sweet FA
Champion of bugger all, 2004 to 2025
Member of sweet FA
Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
I had a good laugh this morning when i found out somebody had changed the page and we were all retards for doing what we do. 

-
- Zone 3
- Posts: 146
- Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 19:39
- Location: St Andrews, Scotland
Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
Which attempt is the famous five? Send me the link and I'll sort it out.palkanetoijala31 wrote:I must say thanx good Dr jbom for adding my citations a free beer is urs when u want itif u can add the link to the famous five attempt in the media would be good as well for people to watch.I would say i would discuss this with andraiensq but people have told me to chill and that is what i will do im actually quite pissed (5 pints of carling 2 spitfires) while typing this and dont care anymore but at least people can probably understand why now!
Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
it was 17 here u go dr Video of the Fantastic Five's day is here - be warned it's a little bit sweary and very very wobbly!jbom wrote:Which attempt is the famous five? Send me the link and I'll sort it out.palkanetoijala31 wrote:I must say thanx good Dr jbom for adding my citations a free beer is urs when u want itif u can add the link to the famous five attempt in the media would be good as well for people to watch.I would say i would discuss this with andraiensq but people have told me to chill and that is what i will do im actually quite pissed (5 pints of carling 2 spitfires) while typing this and dont care anymore but at least people can probably understand why now!
http://www.vimeo.com/6717302
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests