Page 1 of 4
[Rumour] New World Record - 24 March 2011
Posted: 27 Mar 2011, 19:22
by palkanetoijala31
Well if im to believe it was Thursday 24th March
Re: When the record will next be 'reset' ?
Posted: 27 Mar 2011, 21:54
by Steeevooo
Me too, and I would like to congratulate the record breaker here, and urge him (as he is a registered poster on here) to reveal himself with the report of his day!
Re: When the record will next be 'reset' ?
Posted: 27 Mar 2011, 22:02
by palkanetoijala31
Looks like we going to have to go back out there Steveo and Martin i wonder if it was a perfect day march 24th i cant remember looking at the service.
Re: When the record will next be 'reset' ?
Posted: 27 Mar 2011, 22:05
by Sam
That was the day that Charing Cross was flooded so the Bakerloo was down all day...
Re: When the record will next be 'reset' ?
Posted: 27 Mar 2011, 22:10
by palkanetoijala31
Sam wrote:That was the day that Charing Cross was flooded so the Bakerloo was down all day...
It was raining and down all day even more impressive i say!
Re: When the record will next be 'reset' ?
Posted: 27 Mar 2011, 22:11
by Nigel
... not quite all day, as the flood didn't happen until mid-morning (after 10am I think). When I was travelling around 8.30am, if I recall correctly, the description was good service on all lines. Some routes do get the Bakerloo out of the way fairly early on.
Not that I have any knowledege of whom Andi is hinting.
Re: When the record will next be 'reset' ?
Posted: 27 Mar 2011, 22:13
by Nigel
It wasn't raining on Thursday - a lovely sunny day. I know because I was stuck indoors all day, looking out of the window of a course I was on in central London.
Re: When the record will next be 'reset' ?
Posted: 28 Mar 2011, 12:05
by Going Underground
It wasn't rain that caused the flooding it was workmen on the fountains...
Re: [Rumour] New World Records
Posted: 28 Mar 2011, 12:46
by palkanetoijala31
tubeguru wrote:Andi, you have form when it comes to cajoling people to reveal their attempts and times.

true this one was told to me though im still waiting for Tim Roberts and Martha Jackson time to be cofirmed

Re: [Rumour] New World Records
Posted: 28 Mar 2011, 12:58
by Sam
Anyone could say they broke it, doesn't make it fact!
Re: [Rumour] New World Records
Posted: 28 Mar 2011, 14:21
by dudey
I heard a rumour that I broke the record last Thursday. I'm just waiting for GWR confirmation/ratification.
The record in question was 'hours spent not caring'
Re: [Rumour] New World Records
Posted: 28 Mar 2011, 14:26
by nozzacook
Other than the browns record set on a saturday. how many submissions to Guinness have not been ratified.
IMAO if the claim was genuine they would be shouting about it. As the current record is some target to beat.
Re: [Rumour] New World Records
Posted: 28 Mar 2011, 18:19
by palkanetoijala31
nozzacook wrote:Other than the browns record set on a saturday. how many submissions to Guinness have not been ratified.
IMAO if the claim was genuine they would be shouting about it. As the current record is some target to beat.
Well the person(s) involved seemed really happy on friday night but have now gone strangely quiet here and other places they frequent!.
Re: [Rumour] New World Records
Posted: 28 Mar 2011, 23:53
by Steeevooo
Just incase people try to make this into a witch-hunt against Andi, I've also heard the same information from a person registered (and posting) on these forums, so I fully encourage them to state their information on here...
Re: When the record will next be 'reset' ?
Posted: 29 Mar 2011, 03:42
by Neilandrewhall
Also my time on Thursday 24th of March was 17 40.