Page 7 of 10
Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
Posted: 12 Sep 2010, 15:36
by palkanetoijala31
What i cant understand is the current page how is that the defacto page of Tube Challenging or am i making no sense what so ever.?I mean the late 59-2004 did happen didnt it.?
Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
Posted: 12 Sep 2010, 18:31
by tubeguru
palkanetoijala31 wrote:am i making no sense what so ever.?I?
You said it.
Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
Posted: 12 Sep 2010, 21:12
by jbom
As you will guess, I very much preferred the previous fuller version.
Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
Posted: 12 Sep 2010, 21:32
by Sam
The work that you put into it was very good. It's a shame so many people kept editing it...

Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
Posted: 12 Sep 2010, 23:10
by Garion
I think, from what I can make out of that message at the top, is that there is no "official" source or place where the information is from. Granted that the information is taken/based from the information on this site and forum, and a lot of us here are genuine and honest, but I think that as this is a forum where anyone can write anything, it's not an official source so I think thats what that message could imply. Am I making any sense here? Lol...
Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
Posted: 12 Sep 2010, 23:14
by Sam
A lot of articles are like that though, but hey ho, we can rave about ourselves here
FASTEST FEMALE, FASTEST FEMALE, FASTEST FEMALE ..... :p
Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
Posted: 12 Sep 2010, 23:28
by Garion
Well in that case, I can rave about myself here too
FASTEST WELSHMAN, FASTEST WELSHMAN

hehe
Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
Posted: 13 Sep 2010, 12:31
by palkanetoijala31
Hang On i join in Fastest 35 year old na na na na Chase me Ladies Im the Cavalry no citation needed na na na.
Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
Posted: 13 Sep 2010, 13:36
by Sam
You're both pathetic... mine is actually WORTH raving about

Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
Posted: 13 Sep 2010, 13:38
by Garion
Just because you're the first female solo record holder

Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
Posted: 14 Sep 2010, 00:53
by Edgemaster
I'm the first... oh, wait, not first anything

Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
Posted: 14 Sep 2010, 07:28
by Steeevooo
Edgemaster wrote:I'm the first... oh, wait, not first anything

But you're the first person to post to not be first at anything in this lame self-congratulation thread

Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
Posted: 15 Sep 2010, 10:16
by Edgemaster
Oh that sad smiley is looking a bit mad, that can't be right?
Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
Posted: 17 Sep 2010, 18:00
by Soup Dragon
What the hell has happened to the wiki page???
So much good information is now missing, who decided to remove eveything and put such limited information on the wiki page. Was it discussed on the forum, perhaps I missed something? I personally think the old wiki page was much better.
Who is "Chase me lady, I'm the cavalry" ? Are they a forum member
Re: wikipedia provisional or not only records.?
Posted: 17 Sep 2010, 18:11
by Sam
Soup Dragon wrote:Who is "Chase me lady, I'm the cavalry" ? Are they a forum member
They are an admin of Wikipedia and they state that the stuff that was on the page was incorrectly referenced as a lot of it was from blogs and that us as a forum community were just using it to "big" ourselves up.
I think a lot of the content was good that was on it and Jbom spent a lot of time and effort into making the article what it was so it's a shame that it has all gone

Also, the "alternative challenges" page is under consideration for deletion as Chase me lady, i'm the cavalry reckon that the page is not suitable for Wikipedia and should be left on the forum... "where it belongs" apparently...