Re: Grumbleweed II
Posted: 23 Apr 2016, 11:31
I'm going to have a hell of a job working out the scores for this bit 
Page 15 of 27
Re: Grumbleweed II
Posted: 23 Apr 2016, 11:31
But it still had I minute between the shown timestamps
Re: Grumbleweed II
Posted: 23 Apr 2016, 11:35
A Challenge wrote:I'm logged in so it said 'less than one minute ago'!GuyBarry wrote:Just to make things clear, Tube Geek's claim at 11:16 was successful, because yours didn't come in until 11:17. However Tube Geek's claim at 11:19 was unsuccessful because yours was also timestamped 11:19. In all cases it's the time (in minutes) that appears on the post that counts, rather than the actual number of seconds that passes between posts. (This is the same principle as Tumbleweed, I believe.)A Challenge wrote:1 Point
Edit to say I think that was -1 for you!
I have it saying 'minutes ago' not times still. I could log off, I suppose.Tube Geek wrote:But it still had I minute between the shown timestamps
Re: Grumbleweed II
Posted: 23 Apr 2016, 18:07
I really don't think it's worth worrying about. The two of you are well behind me.
Re: Grumbleweed II
Posted: 23 Apr 2016, 18:32
Hang on - can't I claim points? As A Challenge claimed last!
2 points
2 points
Re: Grumbleweed II
Posted: 23 Apr 2016, 19:26
5 Points
Re: Grumbleweed II
Posted: 23 Apr 2016, 19:50
2 pts
Re: Grumbleweed II
Posted: 23 Apr 2016, 19:53
1 Point
Re: Grumbleweed II
Posted: 23 Apr 2016, 19:54
1 pt
Re: Grumbleweed II
Posted: 23 Apr 2016, 20:05
2 Points
Re: Grumbleweed II
Posted: 23 Apr 2016, 20:07
1 point
Re: Grumbleweed II
Posted: 24 Apr 2016, 06:03
50 points
Re: Grumbleweed II
Posted: 24 Apr 2016, 06:07
3 Points
Re: Grumbleweed II
Posted: 24 Apr 2016, 07:20
20 points
(Damn, thought I'd get away with that! Glad I didn't claim 100.)
(Damn, thought I'd get away with that! Glad I didn't claim 100.)
Re: Grumbleweed II
Posted: 24 Apr 2016, 07:48
10 points