Re: Grumbleweed II
Posted: 23 Apr 2016, 11:12
2 pts
Just to make things clear, Tube Geek's claim at 11:16 was successful, because yours didn't come in until 11:17. However Tube Geek's claim at 11:19 was unsuccessful because yours was also timestamped 11:19. In all cases it's the time (in minutes) that appears on the post that counts, rather than the actual number of seconds that passes between posts. (This is the same principle as Tumbleweed, I believe.)A Challenge wrote:1 Point
Edit to say I think that was -1 for you!
I'm logged in so it said 'less than one minute ago'!GuyBarry wrote:Just to make things clear, Tube Geek's claim at 11:16 was successful, because yours didn't come in until 11:17. However Tube Geek's claim at 11:19 was unsuccessful because yours was also timestamped 11:19. In all cases it's the time (in minutes) that appears on the post that counts, rather than the actual number of seconds that passes between posts. (This is the same principle as Tumbleweed, I believe.)A Challenge wrote:1 Point
Edit to say I think that was -1 for you!