tubechallenge.com

jamesthegill wrote:Two? One is deliberately left in (and one board member has already cited it for their answer), but I don't know what the other is.

Can you PM me them please other James?

Ah, what other James read as two clues was what I was reading as one...carry on.

I have no idea so i go for drayton park

Andi is giving me ideas.

Are people forgetting how the PM system works just recently?

I will point out, as Stevo and Dudey will attest, that I can justify this station's inclusion.

However if enough people cry foul I will refer it to a respectable moderator (Neil) to make the decision to rerun it if he deems that I've bent the rules too much.

jamesthegill wrote:I will point out, as Stevo and Dudey will attest, that I can justify this station's inclusion.

However if enough people cry foul I will refer it to a respectable moderator (Neil) to make the decision to rerun it if he deems that I've bent the rules too much.

Are you suggesting that I'm not a respectable moderator?

moley wrote:

jamesthegill wrote:I will point out, as Stevo and Dudey will attest, that I can justify this station's inclusion.

However if enough people cry foul I will refer it to a respectable moderator (Neil) to make the decision to rerun it if he deems that I've bent the rules too much.

Are you suggesting that I'm not a respectable moderator?

fight fight

jamesthegill wrote:I will point out, as Stevo and Dudey will attest, that I can justify this station's inclusion.

However if enough people cry foul I will refer it to a respectable moderator (Neil) to make the decision to rerun it if he deems that I've bent the rules too much.

I can see, with regard to the rules that have been posted on here a couple of times, there being no reason why this station should not be valid - there is certainly evidence to validate its inclusion with respect to those rules.

Question to James - have I given the right answer?

moley wrote:

jamesthegill wrote:I will point out, as Stevo and Dudey will attest, that I can justify this station's inclusion.

However if enough people cry foul I will refer it to a respectable moderator (Neil) to make the decision to rerun it if he deems that I've bent the rules too much.

Are you suggesting that I'm not a respectable moderator?

Nope, I just don't know your first name and I'm not sure how often you're on here, whereas I know Neil's on here a fair bit.

tubeguru wrote:Question to James - have I given the right answer?

No.

Bastard. It certainly reminds me of the area next to the station I answered.

I would say that this is a valid photo, though only just. We can hardly start taking pictures of buildings 100 yards down the road from a station and expect people to get it now, can we?

It an easier one to get than tangy's 15.06 which could be a bridge anywhere.

jamesthegill wrote:

moley wrote:

jamesthegill wrote:I will point out, as Stevo and Dudey will attest, that I can justify this station's inclusion.

However if enough people cry foul I will refer it to a respectable moderator (Neil) to make the decision to rerun it if he deems that I've bent the rules too much.

Are you suggesting that I'm not a respectable moderator?

Nope, I just don't know your first name and I'm not sure how often you're on here, whereas I know Neil's on here a fair bit.

Well you can call Chris (or Moley as most others do), I'm on here twice a day, most days. I just don't post unless I have something of value to add.

I tend to do a fair bit in the background on the forum.

This is the former NLL station at Shoreditch, as shown on this tube map.

Those topping the charts at Rough Trade:
barrykas
Nigel
dudey
Steeevooo
Going Underground
uefacup81
greatkingrat
tangy
nozzacook

Those classed as rough trade:
garion24wales (Hoxton, and later, Bishopsgate)
jbom (Hoxton)
tubeguru (Camden Road)

And Edgemaster, whose answer was:

This is the Shoreditch (North London Line) station building, closed 1940, viaduct re-used by the East London Line, nearest current station being Shoreditch High Street.

Let the complaints begin...

I'm not sure how Edgemaster is wrong there?