Page 10 of 14

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 31 Jul 2015, 09:09
by Nigel
With apologies for the delay, due to me not being near a computer when on holiday, the top times list on the first page is now updated with the new record (which has not yet been ratified by Guinness).

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 10 Aug 2015, 10:56
by Nigel
Top times updated with the prospective Mayoral candidate's recent completion.

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 12 Aug 2015, 08:34
by palkanetoijala31
***** wrote:... and Adham, too. who did all 270 with him.
that person does not exist in the top times thread though geoff and doesnt wish too.

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 13 Aug 2015, 09:35
by Nigel
Nigel wrote:Top times updated with the prospective Mayoral candidate's recent completion.
Christian Wolmar's time has been removed from the list, as I have now learned that it separately failed to meet two of criteria normally considered necessary to be considered a valid completion.

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 13 Aug 2015, 12:10
by palkanetoijala31
Nigel wrote:
Nigel wrote:Top times updated with the prospective Mayoral candidate's recent completion.
Christian Wolmar's time has been removed from the list, as I have now learned that it separately failed to meet two of criteria normally considered necessary to be considered a valid completion.
Two of the cirteria? explain?

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 13 Aug 2015, 12:46
by tractakid
Probably Olympia by Overground

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 13 Aug 2015, 12:53
by greatkingrat
Visited TCR on the Central line maybe?

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 13 Aug 2015, 16:20
by Nigel
tractakid wrote:Probably Olympia by Overground
greatkingrat wrote:Visited TCR on the Central line maybe?
You are both correct.

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 13 Aug 2015, 17:08
by tubeguru
Schoolboy error. How can he be taken seriously in his bid to be mayor if he can't be bothered to read the rules of the record attempt properly? :lol:

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 13 Aug 2015, 18:56
by tufnellpark
Nigel wrote:With apologies for the delay, due to me not being near a computer when on holiday, the top times list on the first page is now updated with the new record (which has not yet been ratified by Guinness).
Andi and Steve,

Is your new FNC record awaiting adjudication by Guinness World Records or have you not submitted it? Almost 30mins off our time is some achievement.

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 13 Aug 2015, 19:34
by Steeevooo
tufnellpark wrote:
Nigel wrote:With apologies for the delay, due to me not being near a computer when on holiday, the top times list on the first page is now updated with the new record (which has not yet been ratified by Guinness).
Andi and Steve,

Is your new FNC record awaiting adjudication by Guinness World Records or have you not submitted it? Almost 30mins off our time is some achievement.
Hi Clive,

Our record attempt initially got rejected by Guinness World Records on the basis that we didn't take a photo to correspond with every single logbook entry, which is a ludicrous requirement on their behalf, which has never been requested on any attempt that I have previously made. As such an appeal has been made to GWR, and we are awaiting the result of this appeal (although to be honest I don't expect them to change their mind). I will be pretty gutted if the appeal doesn't succeed though!

Hope that clarifies the situation,

Steve

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 04 Sep 2015, 02:14
by The Orange One

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 05 Sep 2015, 12:01
by Nigel
I've checked with Harry. Olympia was visited by Overground (not District line), so unfortunately does not qualify for Top Times list.

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 14 Oct 2015, 08:35
by Nigel
Nick468's completion added to the list.

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 18 Oct 2015, 19:43
by palkanetoijala31
I see a time which would be 11th in the list of 16hh 54m 52ss a link on my Facebook page Nigel no idea if rules were applied